Kim Stagliano talks vaccines on CNN!
Posted on February 3rd, 2010 by admin
Related:
Filed under: Andrew Wakefield, Autism in the news, Biomedical Intervention, CDC, Center for Destroying Children, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Combating Autism, Enivronment, Family, Green Our Vaccines, NIH, Vaccination Schedule, Vaccine Court Omnibus Autism Proceeding, Vaccine Precautionary Principles, Vaccine Safety Datalink, Vaccines
Weak Immune System is a contre-indication for vaccinations. It is written in the instruction of vaccines application. Why not focus on THAT first - are the kids with autism have in majority week Immune System? How many of them have check the IS level BEFORE vaccinations? Which IS problems EXACTLY (names) are considered as contre-indication? Which research had the vaccine producers made to include this statement in the instruction? Why not to give exact name of IS states (deceases, genetic states, anti-immune deceases in the family) into instructions?
40% of population is genetically predisposed to have a low MBL, 8% are actually have - 1 of 3 pathways of IS. Rubella, Measles, Polio, Tuberculosis, Hepatitus B, enteroviruses, rettroviruses, even SIDA and candida, which is not a virus, but a common problem with autistic kids - all have MBL receptors to connent to MBL and by this path to be desactivated, eliminated from the body.
MBL was already researched as a target for vaccination, especially Rubella. So - why not to check THIS link first in public? The research was already done, IS has only 3 pathways, vacines producers should have research as well in order to include a line “contre-indications” into their instrucion. Why not to suppose if you have a low MBL then the body could not battle the infection as soon as there is a research showing that if you have low MBL then the reaction of the body on infection is higher? Why not register all cases when parents declare their kids had regressions after vaccination shots and study these cases?
My son had received a MMR+Hepatitus B vaccination at the same day. Several days later he had all signs of Rubella and even deshydratation. A vaccine producer responded to our pediatrician’s phone call that it could not be because of the vaccination and the case was not registered. Why? How they on the phone could say if it is the problem or not if you pediatrician suspected it it, and he has years of experience and saw our son from birth and definitely knows all the signs of Rubella? Why I was never responded by a Commetee supposed to register all these cases?
9 years later they found my son has a low MBL. His brother as well, but he is healthy. And his brother also never received MMR, but he had a big reaction to DTP, another brother is also healthy and also did not receive an MMR, but had a big reaction to BCG. Why to do a BCG to everyone, spend money on this and LATER find out it is ineffective. WHY not to do a proper research before?
By the way, low MBL is the only found genetics problem my son has.
And why are we SO scared to find out that vaccinations could possibly be contre-indication for SOME people if it is even written in their instruction for application - yes, it COULD be exceptions? It is much clearer to find ot who could be an exception, why and find out a solution rather than refuse any further research on this matter.
So, I still have many questions which this doctor did not answer, unfortunately. And I 100% agree with a mom of this lovely family - Do a research, do not say that it was already done in this area. Effectively, there were many reseach on this, but also many of them were found to have mistakes of sampling, etc. So, let’s do a big research, correct and including suggestions of parents - some of them are doctors themselves.